I’m sorry but the District Nine review never got off the ground, the day I was due to start writing it I received a few articles to do for college. On the upside I’m about to post one of these articles right now. Its entitled “men are redundant” and was written to a specific brief given by one of my teachers. I personally do not think men are redundant so please don’t take anything in the article as my own views. I tried to make it funny and entertaining so I hope I succeeded.
Since the late nineteen nineties in laboratories all around the world elite groups of scientists have been hard at work to ensure that men will no longer be needed to keep the human species alive. Aside from ruining all the fun IVF, sperm banks and various other techniques have raised the possibility of side lining men from the child creation process.
However unpleasant this would be men were at least ensured a nightmarish existence where they are occasionally harvested for genetic material while women solve the worlds problems stopping only to glance through a catalogue to choose the ideal sperm for them.
I imagine a clean white room with a rounded modern table, comfortable chairs, the gigantic booklet detailing the family of the prospective sperm creators triumphs and failures. I then imagine something almost exactly like the start of the Matrix when you see the fields of humans the robots are using for fuel.
However according to new scientific advances we are to be denied even this. Amongst one of the seemingly endless parade of miracles that stem cells can conjure up is sperm cells. Professor Karim Neyernia of the University of Newcastle announced in July that “Other cell types don’t generate the next generation, these do”. Simply put these cells can be turned into sperm and in turn into new people.
Beyond the scientific wonder of the whole thing it raises an ethical and moral debate that would and probably still does seem completely unthinkable: From an evolutionary standpoint has humanity outgrown its need for the male? As grand as that question seems it can be answered very quickly by simply saying “no”. The technology is still in its infancy and Professor Neyernia also said “We think, for normal structure development, sperm needs the testes environment,”.
Simply put without balls the artifical sperm will be useless. Now unless science can come up with artificial testicles I think mans place in the world is secure. For the record the image of a room containing thousands of artificial testicles is simultaneously hilarious and revolting.
However that is not to say that the issue of men and their relative usefulness to the species is disarmed completely. The science points out that men are still fundamentally necessary to the whole process but the reality of my matrix situation however unlikely, could still happen.
There is no denying that gender relations in the human species are a total aberration from how things normally work in the animal kingdom. For instance the male preying mantis has a secondary brain in his body so that he can continue mating when the female inevitably starts to eat him head first. Similarly the male black widow can expect to become a meal when his gigantic love interest has gotten what she needs from him. As a side note it gives the term “first time horror story” a whole different meaning.
Humans are one of very few species in which the male is dominant over the female, the reasons suggested for this are numerous, they range from us simply having a different set of rules than most other animals to the way in which our society has developed.
In any case there is very definitely a change on, at the most culturally resonant level various forms of media are now taking an increased interest in women while also maligning and side lining men. The immediate example that springs to my mind is an advertisement in which a patronising woman’s voice explained to her barely hominid husband how to use the washing machine. A new series of advertisements for Alpen go out of the way to point out that they are targeting a female audience by objectifying men.
Or the increasing proliferation of shows aimed squarely at women such as Sex in the City or Samantha Who both of which feature strong female lead characters as well as characters that treat men as sexual objects in a way similar to male characters such as James Bond. Of course I’m not suggesting that this in any way counteracts the fact that women have been portrayed as weak and objectified in all media since media has existed but any change surely indicates that the mood of society is beginning to change.
MEN ARE REDUNDANT.
All it would seem is to now decide what it is exactly that is going to finally spell the end for the male gender. Will it be the uncertain and far off science of stem cell sperm or the even slower march of evolution when it finally realises that humans aren’t playing by the same rules as everyone else. I imagine I will have all the time to wonder how it came to pass while I lie in my pod and wait for someone to pick me from the catalogue.